Don’t take selfies in Auschwitz | Opinion | The Seattle Times

Posted on

Don’t take selfies in Auschwitz | Opinion | The Seattle Times by Leonard Pitts, Jr.  One would think that it is not necessary to publish rules or guidelines as to when or where it is inappropriate to immortalize your grinning mug via a selfie, but Mr. Pitts clearly indicates that such guidelines are necessary.  His column, attached above, tells the story of an Alabama teenage girl who took a “sunshine smile” selfie at the place that has been memorialized as the largest concentration and death camp in the world: Auschwitz, also known as Auschwitz-Birkenau.  (After much fanfare over social media and elsewhere, this young lady defended her action by stating that it was meant to honor her father – on the anniversary of his death – because he passed his love of World War II history on to her.)

Keep in mind, Mr. Pitts’ column is an Opinion piece.

I happen to agree with him.

It is my opinion that it is not appropriate to take a stupid-ass smiling, self-absorbed, thumbs up, V cooties sign above someone else’s head, sticking-out-your tongue selfie or photograph in the following incidents and/or places (this is just a partial list):

  • Auschwitz: a place where 1.1 million humans were tortured and murdered;
  • 9/11 Memorial: where nearly 3,000 human beings were killed by terrorists;
  • Vietnam Veterans Memorial: where names of the dead – 58,286 as of Memorial Day 2013 – are memorialized, 1,200 of which are designated as MIAs, POWs, and others;
  • At scenes of destruction such as someone’s neighborhood post hurricane or burning into non-existence from a forest fire  (your selfie of non-involvement documenting your presence there is disrespectful to those who have lost everything);
  • At evolving crime scenes, such as the one that took place outside of a New Jersey McDonald’s restaurant (Mr. Pitts wrote an Opinion piece on that incident as well, see attached link, to which I also agreed) where one female employee beat up another female employee and while no one intervened to stop the violence, they did take photos and videos and oohed and ahhed at the unfolding action;   and finally,
  • It is not appropriate to take a selfie in front of a corpse peacefully laid to rest in a coffin at a viewing service.

Which begs the question: did this Alabama teenager take a selfie in front of her father’s open casket (if a casket was used and if it was open)?  I would bet that she did not.  Why?  Because it would be disrespectful, distasteful, and inappropriate.  But I have a confession to make.  My family is somewhat guilty of the latter.

My mother died on September 24, 1994 leaving my father a widow.  Within 24-hours of her death, I and my two siblings arrived from out-of-state to support dad and help him with the numerous required tasks leading up to the funeral.  Mom was cremated.

Because the entire family was present at the church funeral, including my sister-in-law and my adult daughter, someone suggested that we all stand around the urn (which sat on a table surrounded by six dozen pink roses at the front of the church) and have our picture taken.

At the conclusion of the service, our photo was taken.  It is a very awkward photo, evidenced by the strained smiles on our faces.  The inner dialogue went something like this, “Someone is taking a photo; you’re always supposed to smile for a photo; ergo, here’s my smile.”

Mom’s urn, placed in 1994. Dad’s urn placed in 2007.

But dad wasn’t smiling.  He just lost his bride of forty-seven years; what’s to smile about?  He stands there with an exhausted and grim look on his face, his left hand touching the top of mom’s urn: one last connection with her before the undertaker removes the container for appropriate storage.

I’m not showing you that funeral-day family photo because there’s no reason why you need to see that private family moment.  More importantly, that photo op just didn’t feel right to me.

Maybe that’s a pretty good barometer from which to gauge the appropriateness or not of our actions.