Category Archives: Quality of Life

The New Yorker Magazine Talks About Dementia

The New Yorker Magazine Talks About Dementia.

I’m thrilled about the above Blog article that just happens to have been posted today, my 60th birthday!  There is a lot of substantive content in my fellow blogger’s posting: a link to a New Yorker Magazine article by Rebecca Mead, titled A Sense of an Ending; Phillip Toledano’s photographs of dementia; and, of course, the Blogger’s own contribution to the topic.  The aforementioned blogger, Kathie Ritchie, maintains an exceptional blogsite, http://www.mydementedmom.com.

I hope you’ll visit all of the above – and be better off as a result.

How’s your rubber band?

Resilience.

I don’t know about you, but I need a dose of resilience right now.  I may not need it next week, or the week after, but I need it now.  I have a certain degree of the stuff, but I think some of it seeped out of my being.  As you’ll see in the very well-written article attached above, resilience means to jump back.

Rubber Bands

(Photo credit: Larry Rosenstein)

Taken a bit further in its definition, resilience is the ability to bounce and not break when difficulties weigh you down.  Being elastic; that sounds like a worthwhile goal.  Until you start feeling the inability to bounce back, you may not even realize that some of the stretch has gone out of your rubber band.

I also need a bit more courage: courage to do all that I need to do, want to do, and plan to do while I’m still able.  Courage comes from the Latin word, heart; to have rock-like inner strength.  Sometimes we go through life thinking that our courage is completely intact until we discover that it’s been compromised due to some event – or string of events – that have come our way.  Do you think that perhaps the only way to know if we’re fully stocked with the stuff is to undergo this sort of testing process?

Probably.

Music to your ears, and your brain

Music to your ears, and your brain: A novel approach to improving memory.

I’ve attached the above article from a fellow blogger because I know for a fact that music memory stays with a person, perhaps longer than any other memory.  I’ll give you one personal example that proved this fact for me.  There are other encouraging examples readily found on the Internet, but because my family experienced this phenomenon first hand, that’s what I’ll talk about, ever so briefly.

Nancy and my father

Nancy and my father

My sister-in-law Nancy lived a life that was steeped in artistic activities.  She was a well-known and respected interior designer and she was a flautist.  A flautist is one who plays the flute.  (I’m providing that definition because the sound of the word “flautist” sounds like an uninvited body function to me.) But I digress.

Nancy enjoyed her music involvements on a small and large scale.  In the early 80′s, she met my brother during a local production of South Pacific – a production in which my brother acted, and for which my sister-in-law provided the music accompaniment.  Fast forward to the year 2012.  I gladly helped my brother out by taking Nancy on outings – sometimes to art museums, sometimes to music events.  Regardless of the outing, I always made sure that my vehicle’s radio was tuned to the classical music station.  I knew Nancy would enjoy it, and I also knew that even after being diagnosed four years earlier with mixed dementia, Nancy would be able to identify the orchestral or operatic pieces being broadcast.

Although I grew up appreciating the classics, the only pieces I can accurately identify are those often-played symphonies such as Beethoven’s 9th Choral Symphony, or Vivaldi’s Four Seasons.  Nancy, on the other hand, could pick out the lesser known arrangements and could identify, with pinpoint accuracy, the conductor and the soloist for that particular piece, e.g.  Leonard Bernstein; Yo Yo Ma.  It saddened me to hear the hesitation in Nancy’s voice when she would speak up while sitting in the passenger seat, making the musical identifying remark but always questioning whether she had done so accurately.  “I think that’s Mozart” or “I think that’s Yo Yo Ma playing his cello.  I think it is.”  Even before the piece was identified on the radio I would assure Nancy, “If you say that’s Yo Yo Ma, by God, it is Yo Yo Ma.”

And she was right – and she was affirmed that she still had a handle on Handel, or Mozart, or Sibelius.  Yep – she never lost her abilities.  What a delight, and what a pleasant interlude during an illness that took her life on July 4th, 2012 at the age of 69.  One thing I know for sure, however, is that from Nancy’s viewpoint right now, she’s enjoying her favorite opera each time Wagner’s “The Ring Trilogy” is played around the world.  Nancy doesn’t need season tickets anymore; she has a front row seat.

There’s an App for that!

A recent article by Jim Fitzgerald of the Associated Press focuses on a few electronic methods that might relieve some of the struggles experienced by caregivers who try to balance their frantic personal lives with the oftentimes emergent needs of their loved ones.  For the purposes of my article, I am only looking at the type of monitoring put in place by a family member to check on an elderly person’s well being; primarily a family member with Alzheimer’s or other dementia.

Beleaguered caregivers getting help from Apps is an eyeopening look at how Smartphone Apps, and other electronic devices, can provide some sort of relief to lessen the caregiver’s load.  Many of those who are long-distance caregivers, such as I was for my father several years ago, might benefit from being able to monitor their family member’s safety and well-being from a distance.

But does such monitoring invade the loved one’s privacy?  Of course it does; but I guess one could say that the benefits outweigh the disadvantages of such monitoring.  Or do they?  What comes to my mind is the elderly person’s gradual loss of independence – an aspect of life that many of us would equate to being a requirement for our own quality of life.  But I digress.

At best, I think electronic monitoring serves as a stop-gap or interim measure of caregiving before hands-on care is put into place.  The Pillbox App keeps a very tentative watch on whether or not a loved one – say a parent – has taken his medication properly.  If the parent does not have compromised executive function, it’s certainly easy to “fake it” so that the daughter can feel as though all is well ten miles away.  In reality, however, medication mismanagement might be taking place, carried out by the parent.

Elderly People - sign on Warwick Road, Olton

(Photo credit: ell brown)

The Alzheimer’s Association Comfort Zone program requires that a loved one wear a GPS device at all times so that family members can monitor their comings and goings throughout the day.  The system is of no benefit if the person doesn’t wear the pager; and if the person has dementia, there’s a strong likelihood of that happening.  I’m being the devil’s advocate here, simply pointing out that the system is only as good as the cooperation required to use it.  HOWEVER, and this is a demonstrative HOWEVER, it appears to be a very worthwhile system that provides numerous benefits.  Other than taking away ones right to privacy, it definitely serves as a safety net for when mom, dad, spouse, or other loved one, are heading into trouble.

I’m skeptical of Comfort Zone but I’m also its fan.  I’ve linked the Comfort Zone website above so that the reader can determine if such a system is worthwhile in his or her situation.  My skepticism comes about because I wish more attention and financing would be spent on a cure for Alzheimer’s and other dementia so that these current monitoring methods become a thing of the past.  A world without Alzheimer’s sounds just as desirous as a world without cancer, or MS, or Lou Gehrig’s disease, to name a few.  More disease control financing = more cures.

One final word: I’ve already experienced two family members with Alzheimer’s and all the caregiving migraine headaches associated with those experiences.  So please know that I’m a proponent of worthwhile practices that ease the caregiver’s burden.  Unfortunately, there is absolutely no fail safe method out there that will give caregivers true peace of mind.  Even placement in a long-term care facility is not a 100% guarantee that mom, dad, sis, or gramps will receive the best care possible.  I’m sorry to burst your bubble – but it’s true.

Death by Intensive Care

Geriatrician, Dennis McCullough wrote an excellent book titled:

My Mother, Your Mother: Embracing Slow Medicine

Keep in mind that although he writes about our elderly parents (those over age eighty), the principles he puts forward apply equally to a spouse or partner, sibling, or good friend.  If you are invested in a loved one’s well-being, please consider reading this book.  Bear with me as I provide a lengthy quote that characterizes this physician’s concerns:

Families must come to appreciate that “medicalized” care is very different in nature and cost from the personal health support and hands-on caring so essential for your parent.  In reality, our American medical system is best at managing acute crises and supplying excellent specialized elective procedures – joint replacements, organ transplants, eye improvements, cosmetic changes – all modern technological wonders.

As for the more ordinary and common management and support of elders and families dealing with chronic problems of aging and slow-moving diseases, our medical care system has not done so well.  Some elderly patients are fruitlessly subjected to what some critics now call “death by intensive care  …  “

Now let’s put ourselves into the shoes of a vulnerable adult sitting in an examination room waiting for the almighty doctor to walk through the door.  Answer this question for me: When was the last time you personally felt rushed during a doctor’s visit for yourself?  (Mine occurred last week – but I digress.)  Many of us think faster than the vulnerable adult, are able to keep track of what the doctor is saying, and have sufficient cognitive awareness to discern the doctor’s recommendations or treatment options.  Dr. McCullough wonders how an elderly person could possibly be treated effectively during a fifteen-minute office appointment by a doctor who peers into a computer screen, barely acknowledging the presence of the patient.  How can that physician possibly treat the complexities of an elder’s needs if he/she is not fully engaged in examining the patient?  Most often, the elder patient will not volunteer information that is not in direct response to a doctor’s insightful inquiries.  They are of a generation that does not question a medical professional – “after all, they have the medical degree, not me.”  The elderly patient may exit the exam room having not even discussed his or her medical concerns – simply because the doctor didn’t give her an opportunity to do so.

Dr. McCullough emphasizes how important it is that each vulnerable patient have a “Circle of Concern” – a group of people that provides steady support and insight into the patient’s needs.  That group may consist of immediate family members, friends, neighbors – anyone dedicated to providing an “active, extended advocacy partnership” that will not only attend to the patient’s technical needs, but also the emotional and human needs that are perhaps in need of greater attention.

My article, Caregiving: The Ultimate Team Sport, promotes a similar type of caring, using the analogy of a team’s various members, and their collective roles on the team.  Each person has a skill that supports the other team members’ skills.  The Circle of Concern serves this same purpose.

Perhaps we should all consider how we would like to be treated by others if/when we become dependent upon their contributions to our quality of life.  Dr. McCullough offers this snippet of Tibetan wisdom:  Make haste slowly.

Not all decisions are emergent ones.  Isn’t a person’s quality of life worth stepping back so that appropriate, “guided” decisions can be made?  Rushed judgment should not take the place of carefully considered care.  As Dr. McCullough states, “Time to begin to ask for more time.  Short of a crisis, don’t be rushed.”

Life: from infancy to the grave

a letter to my son.

The above post is very encouraging – only the title of my re-posting is moribund.  My fellow blogger beautifully captures how fleeting life is as he commemorates the two week anniversary of the birth of his son.

Beautifully written.

Exquisitely described.

A welcome respite in my day.

Thank you “The Matticus Kingdom”

From a fellow blogger whose work is primarily focused on the elderly.  I wouldn’t have it any other way – it’s what I do – but I always welcome the rays of sunshine that the youngest among us can shed on our lives.

Do Not Ask Me To Remember

Walk in Their Shoes… Just for a Minute.  The attached article contains encouraging advice that caregivers worldwide need to read, and re-read, from time to time.

Those of us who have been caregivers to loved ones with Alzheimer’s or other dementia know very well the frustrations felt when we come to the realization that we’re not sufficiently equipped to handle that which this disease presents us.  We’re walking in caregiver shoes, fully incapable of walking in those of the person with dementia.  If we could, we would shriek at what we see and experience.

So we get frustrated – understandably so.  We raise our voices in anger – and feel guilty immediately thereafter.  We complain to others about the one we’re taking care of – because we crave to be heard and understood by someone!

English: PET scan of a human brain with Alzhei...

PET scan of a human brain with Alzheimer’s disease (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Do not ask me to remember is a loaded statement and one which should give us pause.  We know the person with dementia is not able to remember the previous five seconds, so why do we ask them to remember where and when they were born?  Why do we think that repeating an answer LOUDLY AND WITH EMPHASIS will help the loved one remember this tenth time you’ve answered their same question?  Why do we think they will understand our logical explanations about circumstances when their ability to understand anything requiring organization of thought is a function forsaken long ago by the brain that they’ve been stuck with.

Because we’re human – and we want order out of chaos, and we want the one for whom we are providing care to finally “get it.”  And we want them to understand that this ain’t no cake walk for me so why aren’t you appreciating all that I do for you?

Because they don’t remember.

Entering the arena of vulnerability.

It’s not the critic who counts; it’s not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles; or where the doer of deeds could have done them better.

re-enactment of a gladiator fight in the arena...

(Photo credit: Wikipedia)

The credit goes to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred with dust and sweat and blood, who strives valiantly and who errs and fails, and is sometimes victorious.  But when he fails, at least he does so daring greatly.

The above is an abbreviated quote from Theodore Roosevelt’s speech, Citizenship in a Republic a/k/a The Man in the Arena, delivered at the Sorbonne in Paris, France, on April 23, 1910.

Brené Brown, PhD, paraphrased the above when appearing on Oprah Winfrey’s show, Super Soul Sunday.  I admit – I’m addicted to the types of shows that challenge the way I think, and/or that validate the way I think.  This particular show that aired on OWN March 17, 2013, floored me.  I needed it because I’m in the arena right now while in the midst of writing my first novel.

  • What if I don’t get representation by an agent?
  • What if I secure an agent, but the agency can’t sell it to a publisher?
  • What if my novel gets published, but it gets panned by book critics everywhere?

I guess if that happens I will need to be glad that I had the confidence to try; to dare to think that I could get published in the very competitive world of writing.  The following is what Brené Brown said to herself – and perhaps to others – after she was severely criticized after delivering a speech at a conference a few years ago:

If you’re not in the arena getting your butt kicked, I’m not interested in your feedback.

I like her spunk because with that statement she’s basically telling her critics to suck it if they don’t care for her work – because at least she put herself out there; she showed up; she tried.  Ms. Brown says that there is no innovation and creativity without failure.  We all must take the risk to fail when we’re doing something that we know without a shadow of a doubt we were meant to be doing.

How ridiculous of me to be so concerned about what might happen, when I’ve yet to even finish my manuscript.  I believe in what I’m doing.  I’m proud of my motivation/mission statement for writing my book.  Oh my God  – I’m writing a book!  I don’t know if it will get published but that’s a concern for which I don’t have time right now.  I am only half way through writing the manuscript so I guess I’ll just have to keep showing up at my computer and get the darn thing done!

What about you?  What brings you to the arena in which you are now standing?  Or what prevents you from entering the arena?  In the very same second that you decide to enter the arena, it’s okay to be both brave and scared.

Maybe your arena is changing your career path; or getting into – or out of – a relationship.  Perhaps your arena is standing up for what you believe in and daring to express those beliefs.

You can’t get to courage without walking through vulnerability.  Don’t wallow in regrets – walk into the arena without fearing failure or success.

Bullying: now versus then.

In January of this year, I provided a workshop for middle school students (8 to 12 years old) during their school’s annual Health Fair.  Given my predisposition to focus on the older population during my career, I was asked to bring forth a topic that might resonate with, and educate, the children who attended my workshops; something about old people, a topic about which they supposedly knew very little.

The title of my workshop was Your Grandparents are Cooler than you Think.  My goal was to bridge the gap that exists between those aged sixty years and older, with the younger-aged set.  My sophisticated, yet relatable, PowerPoint presentation offered many comparison and contrast examples that tended to disprove that any gap exists between such disparate groups.  (That was my goal.)  One can’t deny that some obvious differences exist, but the similarities with subject matters that really count are quite revealing.  First, I offer you a quote from the Atlantic Journal, challenging you to guess when this particular entry was published.  I read this same quote to the middle school students.

The world is too big for us.  Too much is going on.  Too many crimes.  Too much violence and excitement.  Try as you will, you get behind in the race in spite of yourself.  It’s a constant strain to keep peace  …  and still, you lose ground.

Science empties its discoveries on you so fast that you stagger beneath them in hopeless bewilderment.  The political world now changes so rapidly, you’re out of breath trying to keep pace with who’s in and who’s out.

Everything is high pressure.  Human nature can’t endure much more!

If you guessed that the above quote was ripped from today’s headlines – or thereabouts – you are incorrect.  These vital words were written 180 years ago, published on June 16, 1833.  The common sentiments of that time seem almost indistinguishable from what is in the minds of people today.  Amazing.  I guess we’re not much different from the people living in 1833.

English: this is my own version of what bullyi...

(Photo credit: Wikipedia)

One of the topics these middle schoolers and I discussed was Bullying.  The students were divided into eight groups of five each and asked to discuss the similarities, if any, of this globally prevalent problem.  Their insights were astounding.  Here is my paraphrase of some of their comments:

I think bullying in the olden days was more physical, whereas today, it’s psychological in nature.

Bullying a long time ago was limited to one-on-one interaction.  Today, if just one person is bullied, that act is broadcast to thousands just by the push of an “enter” key on ones computer.

I think there is little difference between bullying now, versus then.  You see, the motivation is the same; the intent to make someone else feel small; to exert ones power over another.  It doesn’t matter what that looks like or when it took place, the motivation remains the same.

I was humbled by these students, but I should not have been surprised by their astute thinking processes.  Perhaps the person who learned the most during my workshop was the presenter.  I thought I needed to convince them of how similar their elders are to them.  I guess the joke was on me.

The inspiration to write this article can be attributed to the driver behind me on my way home from the store today who bullied me by riding my bumper the entire way home.  My going the speed limit must have been quite an affront to her sensibilities.  (I couldn’t pull over to the side of the road but she had plenty of opportunities to pass me – evidently choosing not to do so.)  At almost sixty years of age, I felt threatened, powerless, and humiliated.

Wanted: new caregiving skill – mind reading.

Benjamin Button Effect: What Do You Do When Your Mom Cries Out Like a Baby?.

Being a mind reader would greatly benefit every parent of a newborn baby, and all caregivers of those with Alzheimer’s or other dementia.  The article attached above, by Blogger Kathy Ritchie, is a thoroughly relatable article that is raw in its presentation, but wreaking with truth because of that rawness.

Will Arnett at the premiere of Baby Mama in Ne...

(Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Reading Kathy Ritchie’s article I was instantly reminded of a line from the television series, Up All Night, wherein new parents, played by Will Arnett and Christina Applegate, fail miserably in their efforts to get their infant daughter Amy to fall asleep and stay asleep.  They try everything they can think of to address the baby’s distress: diaper changing, giving her a bottle, reading stories, making funny faces – you get the drill.  In desperation, Will Arnett finally says to his infant daughter, “We’re on your side!”

When you can’t force understanding on someone you’re taking care of, you wing it or you pull every trick out of every “How To” book written on this task of caregiving.   Yet more often than not, even with all the resources available at your fingertips, you make little headway in your attempts to meet the emergent needs your loved one presents to you.  Or what works one day (or hour) may not work the next day.  Why?  Because Alzheimer’s and other dementias are very unpredictable diseases; and people with dementia are unique individuals, equally as unpredictable.  There is no one formula for how to respond to any given situation.

As Kathy states in her article, “You have to work very hard to find the funny.”  I think many of us, given the choice, would settle for finding all the right answers and do without finding the funny – but the funny incidents are a great addition to ones day.

Caregivers of the world – you are not alone and if you need someone to tell you what a great job you’re doing, I’m telling you right now – YOU’RE DOING A GREAT JOB!!!

Your journey is filled with speed bumps and ruts in the road, but you continue on that path anyway because of your commitment to your loved ones.  After all, they had no choice in the matter when they ended up with Alzheimer’s or other dementia.  You’re both innocent victims.

I Can’t Believe I Did That !!!!!!!!!

I Can’t Believe I Did That !!!!!!!!!.

One of my fellow Bloggers wrote a great article (above) to bring an explosively humorous end to my work week.  Thank you for sharing your humiliation with the rest of us.  Been there – done that myself – far too many times.

Speaking of which  …  my husband and I were in Home Depot last Sunday; me walking ahead of him as he pushed the shopping cart.  A 30-something couple walked towards me, and then past me towards my husband, and oh my goodness  …  one of them must have not been able to hold in the flatulence one second longer.  I wilted amongst the fumes – turned around to look at my husband and his face was twisted in a disgusted-looking, painful way, and he quickly slapped his hand over his nose.  I said to him, “I know, right?  Must have left a pile somewhere in this aisle!” then I continued walking onward only to discover that the fumes filled the length of that aisle.  I started running in a vain attempt to escape the blanket of stinkyness, and soon thereafter, my husband could be seen running with his heavily loaded-down shopping cart making the same attempt at escape.  (I know – we’re both quite juvenile.)

When we left the store, my husband was certain that someone must have been videotaping us and no doubt, we are now You Tube stars, gaining lots of followers around the world.

Being a caregiver or being cared for: there’s really no escape hatch.

In my post, President Obama says the “A” word: Alzheimer’s, I provided some Alzheimer’s statistics that focus on those who are predicted to be diagnosed with Alzheimer’s or other dementia in the years to come.  I also talked about caregiver statistics.

One statistic that really resonates with me is the following: a new caregiver is set into action every 33 seconds because someone will develop Alzheimer’s every 33 seconds.  In actuality, the stats are far greater than that.  Caregivers are “created” every second of the day because there are countless diseases requiring the assistance of someone just like you and me – an unpaid caregiver for a loved one.  I use the distinction of “unpaid” so as not to be confused with those who work as caregivers in the health care industry.

The following statement is attributed to former First Lady of the United States, Rosalynn Carter:

There are only four kinds of people in the world – those who have been caregivers,

those who are currently caregivers,

those who will be caregivers, and

those who will need caregivers.

I really don’t think there’s any way around it.  How about you?  Have you dodged the caregiver or being-cared-for bullet yet?

President Obama Says the “A” Word: Alzheimer’s

President Obama Says the “A” Word: Alzheimer’s.

Lest you think that Alzheimer’s has nothing to do with you, look at the following statistics provided by the Alzheimer’s Association:

  • By the year 2050, nearly one million new cases will be diagnosed each year – that’s one American developing Alzheimer’s every 33 seconds.  Taken further, that most likely equates to nearly one and a half million new family caregivers each year – considering that at least one family member will be involved in managing a loved one’s care;
  • Ten million Baby Boomers will get Alzheimer’s;
  • On average, 40% of a person’s years with Alzheimer’s are spent in the most severe stage of the disease;
  • The number of Americans that die each year from Alzheimer’s disease has risen 66% since the year 2000;
  • Alzheimer’s is the sixth-leading cause of death in the United States;
  • Today, there are no Alzheimer’s survivors – none.

Please take time to read the article I’ve attached above and consider the following: We are going to pay for Alzheimer’s one way or the other – now, or later.

This is a disease that will affect you, your children, your grandchildren, great-grandchildren, and beyond.  Burying our heads in the sand won’t solve anything.  Please consider donating to the Alzheimer’s Association as well as contacting your state’s congressional leaders asking for greater federal funding for Alzheimer’s research.  Why?  Because of this staggering statistic:

According to the National Institute of Health, the federal government currently spends much less money on Alzheimer’s research, prevention, and cure than on other conditions such as cancer, heart disease, and HIV.

  • $6 billion for cancer;
  • $4 billion for heart disease;
  • $3 billion for HIV/AIDS; but just
  • $480 million for Alzheimer’s disease.

I’m not comfortable with those numbers – are you?

The first Valentine’s Day without your loved one.

The First Times Without.

Scan of a Valentine greeting card dated 1909.

(Photo credit: Wikipedia)

The above article recounts the personal feelings of a blogger who is experiencing his first Valentine’s Day without his wife who died on July 4, 2012.  For those of us not experiencing such a loss, we may too readily try to point out that this “holiday” is truly only Hallmark greeting card day, or florists and chocolate manufactures making lots of money day.  It’s more than that – especially when so many memories are tied to the event.  Whenever a “first time without” comes around on the calendar, the dread leading up to that date can be very troublesome, as it was for this blogger.

I recently watched a show in which interior designer, Nate Berkus, said the following about the things we have in our lives:

The truth is – that things matter.  They have to because they’re what we live with and touch each and every day.

They represent what we’ve seen, who we’ve loved, and where we hope to go next.

They remind us of the good times and the rough patches and everything in between that’s made us who we are.

Events, celebrations, and the like provide the same type of life-shaping experiences.  That’s why today is far more than a commercial and financial windfall for the greeting card, floral, and chocolate industries.  Without someone with whom to celebrate the focus of this day, it becomes a non-day from which you can not escape.  Thank God for the memories, the photos, even the many things around the house that represent the touch and essence of our Valentine.

I interrupt your life for this brief message.

relaxing-on-the-beach

When was the last time you just soaked it all in?  I’m not talking about soaking in the sun’s rays – hard to find in most places at this time of year anyway.  And I’m not referring to settling your weary body down into a relaxing hot bath.

How about today, you decide to soak in all the good that is in your life?

But you say, “I have no time for that because the bad in my life far outweighs the good.”  My response to that?  Perhaps you need to even out the scales.

Right now, make a concerted effort to write down three things for which you can be grateful; things that encourage a smile on your face; things that make you forget – even for a second – all that weighs you down.

Now celebrate those three things by soaking in the feather light feeling they create.  If that sensation is something you’d like to feel again, well – you’re in charge.  Set aside time each day to allow the good to displace some of the bad.

If you celebrate even the smallest of good aspects of your life, you may discover that countless mini-parties await you.  What have you got to lose?